2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of machine learning and statistical methods for evaluating building performance: A systematic review and future benchmarking framework

Abdulrahim Ali,
Raja Jayaraman,
Elie Azar
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach was to apply selected SL algorithms deeming representative for recent applications [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] to the data simulated by the UTCI-Fiala model [27] at stage 2 of the UTCI development (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our approach was to apply selected SL algorithms deeming representative for recent applications [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] to the data simulated by the UTCI-Fiala model [27] at stage 2 of the UTCI development (Figure 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical or machine learning (SL) is central to artificial intelligence (AI) applications [1][2][3] with potential relevance to environmental risk assessment, especially in settings with high dimensional input as for thermal stress indices [4]. There, they may assist or even attempt replacing the biometeorological expert judgement, as indicated by the increasing number of recent application studies in this field [5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the key difference between traditional statistical approaches and ML is that, in ML, a model learns from examples rather than being programmed with rules. For a given task, examples are provided in the form of inputs (called features or attributes) and outputs (called labels or classes) [44,45].…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%