2013
DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.108200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of restorative materials used in abfraction lesions in tooth with and without occlusal restoration: Three-dimensional finite element analysis

Abstract: Objectives:The present comparative analysis aimed at evaluating the mechanical behavior of various restorative materials in abfraction lesion in the presence and absence of occlusal restoration.Materials and Methods:A three-dimensional finite-element analysis was performed. Six experimental models of mandibular first premolar were generated and divided into two groups (groups A and B) of three each. All the groups had cervical abfraction lesion restored with materials and in addition group A had class I occlus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of low-modulus restorative materials in dentistry has been shown to facilitate stress distribution. Thus, integrity of structure for the tooth and the restoration is provided [31,32]. In this study, it was thought that GCC is resistant to stress resulting from chewing force.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The use of low-modulus restorative materials in dentistry has been shown to facilitate stress distribution. Thus, integrity of structure for the tooth and the restoration is provided [31,32]. In this study, it was thought that GCC is resistant to stress resulting from chewing force.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The materials and structures properties were attributed to each solid component with isotropic, homogeneous and linearly elastic behavior. Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio were reported (Table 1) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and all contacts were ideally cast.…”
Section: Fea Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restorative materials with low modulus of elasticity should be the first choice to restore abfraction lesions 15,16,31 . When the aesthetic is not a concern, glass ionomer should be used, because these restorations revealed the best results in the context of clinical effectiveness 15,27 .…”
Section: A B Cmentioning
confidence: 99%