2013
DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-12-26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative analysis of the properties of regulated promoter systems commonly used for recombinant gene expression in Escherichia coli

Abstract: BackgroundProduction of recombinant proteins in bacteria for academic and commercial purposes is a well established field; however the outcomes of process developments for specific proteins are still often unpredictable. One reason is the limited understanding of the performance of expression cassettes relative to each other due to different genetic contexts. Here we report the results of a systematic study aiming at exclusively comparing commonly used regulator/promoter systems by standardizing the designs of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
129
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
11
129
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this strategy is sometimes difficult to scale up due to variation in media formulations. In conclusion, the ability to control expression levels is a key element in the choice of bacterial expression vectors [9,10].…”
Section: Choice Of Promotersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this strategy is sometimes difficult to scale up due to variation in media formulations. In conclusion, the ability to control expression levels is a key element in the choice of bacterial expression vectors [9,10].…”
Section: Choice Of Promotersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive work has been carried out to improve E. coli as a host for recombinant protein expression [21,31]. It is well known that promoter plays an important role in protein heterologous production, and is particularly important for producing functional protein [32]. In most conditions, the strong T7 promoter results in high-level expression, although many proteins were expressed by using this system, including FAD-GDH, they are not correctly folded and end up as inclusion bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[83] Recently, Balzer et al re-examined commonly used promoter systems in E. coli (XylS/P m , LacI/P T7lac , LacI/P tac ,a nd AraC/P BAD )a nd conducted comparative expression studies. [84] LacI/P T7lac turned out as highly advantageousa tatranscriptional level. Contradictory,o nt he level of translational, transcriptsw ere often translated into vast amountso fi nactive (insoluble) proteins.…”
Section: On the Levels Of Transcriptiona Nd Translationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Contradictory,o nt he level of translational, transcriptsw ere often translated into vast amountso fi nactive (insoluble) proteins. [84] This is long known for the popular pET system which also utilizes the LacI/P T7lac promoter. [85] Gene expression is induced by IPTG, al actose analogue that is not readily metabolized granting prolonged high expression levels.P romoters for metabolice ngineering must show tight control to avoid undesiredm etabolic load from leaky expression which is the case with the T7 expression system.…”
Section: On the Levels Of Transcriptiona Nd Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%