2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13315-2_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Analysis of the Perceived Quality of VoIP under Various Wireless Network Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because speech perception may vary with the use of different packet loss concealment settings and codecs, we cannot generalize our results for all VoIP software available on the market. VoIP audio quality may further be influenced by wireless network conditions [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because speech perception may vary with the use of different packet loss concealment settings and codecs, we cannot generalize our results for all VoIP software available on the market. VoIP audio quality may further be influenced by wireless network conditions [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have extended the QoE study described in [12] for Android users to better understand the impact of the network conditions on the QoE. The next milestone is the deployment of a small-scale testbed and the performance of empirical studies with u-map clients and "virtual providers" (using our software-defined radio testbed).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Moller et al [14] and Tsompanidis et al [18] consider the problem of QoE measurement for VoIP applications in heterogeneous access networks by considering network impairments such as handoffs and network congestion. However, they consider models such as the ITU-T E-Model [4] for QoE measurement.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationships between several parameters such as delay, jitter, packet loss and users QoE has been studied widely in the literature [14], [18]. Even then, these relationships may not correctly model users QoE due to dynamic nature of underlying network conditions and the user environment where uncertainty plays a dominant role.…”
Section: A Decision-theoretic Approach For Quality Of Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%