2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative appraisal of hydrological behavior of SRTM DEM at catchment level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, low DEM resolution might result in decreased slopes, which directly impact sub-basin delineation and stream network formation. Therefore, terrain indices such as Stream Power Index (SPI) and Slope Length Factor (SLF) that are used to measure suspended sediment along a channel in SWAT are affected, which in turns affects the prediction quality (Sharma & Tiwari, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, low DEM resolution might result in decreased slopes, which directly impact sub-basin delineation and stream network formation. Therefore, terrain indices such as Stream Power Index (SPI) and Slope Length Factor (SLF) that are used to measure suspended sediment along a channel in SWAT are affected, which in turns affects the prediction quality (Sharma & Tiwari, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the DEM was downloaded from the SRTM database (Falorni et al, 2005;Sharma and Tiwari, 2014), the land use type was downloaded from the USGS land use type database (Loveland et al, 1991(Loveland et al, , 2000, and the soil type was downloaded from FAO soil type database (http://www.isric.org). The downloaded DEM has a spatial resolution of 90 m × 90 m, considering LRB is large.…”
Section: Terrain Property Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the development of remote sensing sensors and techniques, terrain data covering global range with high resolution has become readily available and could be acquired inexpensively. For example, the digital elevation model (DEM) at 30 m grid cell resolution with global coverage could be freely downloaded (Falorni et al, 2005;Sharma and Tiwari, 2014), which largely enhances the development and application of the distributed hydrological models. After that, many distributed hydrological models have been proposed, such as the WATERFLOOD model (Kouwen, 1988), THALES model (Grayson et al, 1992), VIC model (Liang et al, 1994), DHSVM model (Wigmosta et al, 1994), CASC2D model (Julien et al, 1995), WetSpa model (Wang et al, 1997), GBHM model (Yang et al, 1997), WEP-L model (Jia et al, 2001), Vflo model (Vieux et al, 2002), tRIBS model (Vivoni et al, 2004), WEHY model (Kavvas et al, 2004), Liuxihe model (Chen et al, 2011(Chen et al, , 2016, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) data has emerged as a global elevation data in the past one decade because of its free availability, homogeneity, and consistent accuracy compared to other global elevation dataset [15] …”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%