2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-3780(03)00034-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative assessment of climate vulnerability: agriculture and ranching on both sides of the US–Mexico border

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
74
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[WGII 14.4.4] The vulnerability of North American agriculture to climatic change is multidimensional and is determined by interactions between pre-existing conditions, indirect stresses stemming from climate change (e.g., changes in pest competition, water availability), and the sector's capacity to cope with multiple, interacting factors, including economic competition from other regions as well as improvements in crop cultivars and farm management . Water availability is the major factor limiting agriculture in south-east Arizona, but farmers in the region perceive that technologies and adaptations such as crop insurance have recently decreased vulnerability (Vasquez-Leon et al, 2003). Areas with marginal financial and resource endowments (e.g., the US northern plains) are especially vulnerable to climate change (Antle et al, 2004).…”
Section: 624mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[WGII 14.4.4] The vulnerability of North American agriculture to climatic change is multidimensional and is determined by interactions between pre-existing conditions, indirect stresses stemming from climate change (e.g., changes in pest competition, water availability), and the sector's capacity to cope with multiple, interacting factors, including economic competition from other regions as well as improvements in crop cultivars and farm management . Water availability is the major factor limiting agriculture in south-east Arizona, but farmers in the region perceive that technologies and adaptations such as crop insurance have recently decreased vulnerability (Vasquez-Leon et al, 2003). Areas with marginal financial and resource endowments (e.g., the US northern plains) are especially vulnerable to climate change (Antle et al, 2004).…”
Section: 624mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these first two counties, we narrow down to the production of specific commodities that dominate county income (tart cherries and pecans) to demonstrate the role of institutional factors. Cochise County ranks sixth in Arizona for crop sales, but was selected as an example because it is one of the few locations in the Southwest where there has been research specifically on contextual vulnerability of agricultural communities that highlights the importance of capital assets and institutional factors (Vasquez-Leon et al 2003;Vasquez-Leon 2009). These snapshots are not full vulnerability assessments and the examples given here comprise necessarily incomplete contextual analysis.…”
Section: Towards Identifying Contextual Vulnerabilities In Southwestementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have incorporated the SL approach for assessing vulnerability (Vasquez-Leon et al 2003;Eakin and Bojorequez-Tapia 2008;Li et al 2013;Gautam et al 2013). The SL framework helps identify the sensitivity of assets, entitlements, and critical assets for coping with and adapting to risks while linking livelihood strategies to opportunities and constraints of the broader institutional and biophysical environment (Kelly and Adger 2000;Eakin and Luers 2006).…”
Section: Combining Sustainable Livelihood (Sl) Framework With Fcm Appmentioning
confidence: 99%