2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-014-1384-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative assessment of indirect methods for estimating the uniaxial compressive and tensile strength of rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained results confirmed the superiority of the block punch index over Is 50 in terms of prediction of the BTS. The correlation between TS and Is 50 have been also examined by other studies such as Kahraman and Gunaydin [16], Heidari et al [8], Basu et al [17], Karaman et al [18] and Mahdiyar et al [19]. Sheorey [20] underlined the broadlyacknowledged statement about the correlation of BTS and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) in rocks, stating that the compressive strength of rock is roughly ten times greater than the BTS of that rock; though, it should be noted that the rock behavior is rather site-specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The obtained results confirmed the superiority of the block punch index over Is 50 in terms of prediction of the BTS. The correlation between TS and Is 50 have been also examined by other studies such as Kahraman and Gunaydin [16], Heidari et al [8], Basu et al [17], Karaman et al [18] and Mahdiyar et al [19]. Sheorey [20] underlined the broadlyacknowledged statement about the correlation of BTS and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) in rocks, stating that the compressive strength of rock is roughly ten times greater than the BTS of that rock; though, it should be noted that the rock behavior is rather site-specific.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Rock samples from borehole coring were tested in the laboratory for the determination of engineering properties using the uniaxial compressive strength, Brazilian tensile strength, and point load strength index as well as direct shear strength using suggested methods by [2], [3], [4] & [5]. The rock density and water content was also determined in the laboratory.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have developed different indirect tests and approaches to estimate UCS for different rocks. Many researchers suggested simpler tests, such as destructive tests like point load and non-destructive ones like ultrasonic wave velocity, Schmidt rebound hammer tests, as indirect alternatives to estimate UCS (Basu and Kamran 2010;Chang et al 2006;Heidari et al 2012;Kahraman 2001;Karaman et al 2015;Katz et al 2000;Salehin 2017;Singh et al 2012;Yagiz 2011;Yasar and Erdogan 2004). On the other side, some researchers have developed correlations between UCS and the other characteristics such as porosity, density, Brazilian tensile strength, and block punch strength index or with more than one of the mentioned indices using mathematical and statistical methods (Baykasoğlu et al 2008;Kahraman and Gunaydin 2009;Minaeian and Ahangari 2013;Mishra and Basu 2012;Sharma and Singh 2008;Sonmez and Tunusluoglu 2008;Tuğrul and Zarif 1999;Ulusay et al 2001;Yesiloglu-Gultekin et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%