National Employment, Migration and Education in the GCC 2013
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1s474nj.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Assessment of Labor Market Nationalization Policies in the GCC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Administrations often perform poorly due to overstaffing and weak incentive systems [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Labor Market Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Administrations often perform poorly due to overstaffing and weak incentive systems [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Labor Market Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 There are huge direct and indirect costs to surplus public employment: a large, usually dominant share of potentially productive national manpower is ''parked'' in jobs, whose economic contribution is questionable. Public sector employment policies give questionable education incentives, leading to an undersupply of national skills relevant in the private market [23]. Public sector over-employment also creates large, unnecessary overhead costs and negative environmental and infrastructure externalities [39].…”
Section: Labor Market Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The nationalization policies are applied years. In this respect, the employment policies of dominant public sector create significant differences between the working environment of public and private sectors [13]. Through the nationalization policies, governments have been trying to shift the employment structure from public dominant to market oriented.…”
Section: Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%