2019
DOI: 10.1080/11956860.2019.1586118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative assessment of tree diversity, biomass and biomass carbon stock between a protected area and a sacred forest of Western Odisha, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent similarity in Ep distribution in DPF and UPF was most likely due to the spatial patterns of stands that enable them to efficiently utilize the resources, such as sunlight, soil fertility, and species coexistence from the same functional group. Contrary to our findings, Pradhan et al (2019) reported that the sacred groove forest managed by the local community had greater species richness, density and diversity than the wildlife sanctuary. This may be due to more awareness, religious beliefs and involvement of local people in forest management and conservation activities.…”
Section: Biodiversity Of Khair Dominated Forestscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent similarity in Ep distribution in DPF and UPF was most likely due to the spatial patterns of stands that enable them to efficiently utilize the resources, such as sunlight, soil fertility, and species coexistence from the same functional group. Contrary to our findings, Pradhan et al (2019) reported that the sacred groove forest managed by the local community had greater species richness, density and diversity than the wildlife sanctuary. This may be due to more awareness, religious beliefs and involvement of local people in forest management and conservation activities.…”
Section: Biodiversity Of Khair Dominated Forestscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Non-protected area regimes (corridors and large forest connectivity blocks) allow the harvesting of the forest such as fuelwood, timber, and non-timber forest products for the discrepancy in carbon content. This also supports the argument that carbon stock is higher in protected areas than in non-protected areas highlighted in many studies in Southeast Asia [ 47 ], India [ 48 ], and Nepal [ 49 ]. The Government of Nepal’s target to increase the protection regime to 30% by 2030 from the current 24% and maintaining 45% of total area under forest cover as committed in country position paper under Global Biodiversity Framework in CoP 15 in 2022 and Second Nationally Determined Contributions submitted to the International Paris Agreement in CoP 24 in 2020.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The highest carbon stock potential was recorded for Tectona grandis which contributes a larger share to the total carbon stock of 199.19 Mg C ha -1 owing to its high basal area, density, and deep roots (Clément et al, 2019). The values of above-ground biomass are comparable to other India dry tropical deciduous forests (Mohanta et al, 2020;Pattnayak et al, 2021;Pradhan et al, 2019). Variations in the biomass values were observed at different environmental, structural, and phytosociological characteristics of the regions that include the intensity of anthropogenic interference on the forests (reflected in Cumulative Disturbance Index), structure and composition of the forest, range of forest succession, etc.…”
Section: Influence Of Different Drivers On Natural Forestsmentioning
confidence: 84%