2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Cost Utility Analysis For First Line Treatment Of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Nsclc) Patients With Egfr Exon 19 Deletions Or Exon 21 (L858r) Substitution Mutations

Abstract: A5from pragmatic trials, and another 4 studies (23.5%) from observational studies. The odds ratio for effectiveness versus efficacy being cost-effective was 8.75 (95% confidence interval; 0.74 to 103.82). ConClusions: Most CEA studies in asthma used efficacy data to inform CEA. Studies using effectiveness data trend toward being more likely to disseminate cost-effective findings than those using efficacy data. Health policy decision makers should pay attention to the type of "E" evidence used in CEAs for accur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance