2012
DOI: 10.5923/j.edu.20120207.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Evaluation of Alternative Blended Learning Models Used for Teaching Academic English (EAP/ESAP) to Students of Computer Sciences

Abstract: This paper describes the use of a number of alternative blended learning models based on a mixture of tradit ional face-to-face classes with some elements of e-learn ing in the course of "English for Academic Purposes" (EAP) and "English for Specific Academic Pu rposes" (ESAP) taught to junior and senior undergraduate students of co mputer sciences in the undergraduate program of Business Informat ics and Software Engineering over a period of time fro m 2009 to 2012 at the

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident from Table 5 that there are no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) among the study group students' mean scores with satisfaction towards blended learning styles (individual rotation-flipped class-lab rotationrotation model). These results align with the findings of several studies, such as Kuzmina and Golechkova (2012), Holm et al (2022), and Suleiman and Al-Sayed (2016. They can be explained by the fact that there are no fundamental differences between these patterns.…”
Section: Results Of the Second Questionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is evident from Table 5 that there are no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) among the study group students' mean scores with satisfaction towards blended learning styles (individual rotation-flipped class-lab rotationrotation model). These results align with the findings of several studies, such as Kuzmina and Golechkova (2012), Holm et al (2022), and Suleiman and Al-Sayed (2016. They can be explained by the fact that there are no fundamental differences between these patterns.…”
Section: Results Of the Second Questionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Many studies have compared the effectiveness of these styles to reach the most effective blended learning styles and then adopted them. Kuzmina and Golechkova (2012) showed that the blended learning environments were based on face-to-face learning and some educational platforms (Pbworks and Wetpaint; BI HSE IELTS Class; LMS-HSE LMS eFront) at the National Research University Higher School of Economics improved students' academic achievement, making them more satisfied. No difference between the two blended learning styles (flexible/flipped class) exists to provide production skills of audio programs to students at the College of Education (Holm et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the study given by Esfandiari to demonstrate the importance and necessity of ESAP classes in Iran, there is another research which also emphasizes the significance of ESAP about The International English Language Testing System (IELTS). IELTS is regarding as one of the most universal and popular English language test for oversea students According to the study result from Kuzmina and Golechkova that participants who take part in the ESAP courses get better grades in IELTS test compared with those who participate in EGAP courses, and the skills of listening, speaking, reading and writing do improve after taking related ESAP courses [15] . ESAP is not only having positive effects on education but also on finance [2] .…”
Section: The Case Study Of Esapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superficial model is based on four elements: location, media, separation and synchronicity (Bonk & Graham, 2006;Robertson, 2010) and involves different delivery strategy with the due consideration of the need for the power and control relationships between students, parents, teachers and learning environment remaining unchanged. Kuzmina & Golechkova (2012) maintain that a course that blends both the online and face-to-face delivery strategy, its substantial proportion of the content is delivered online, uses online discussions and typically has some face-to-face meetings would be the best to adapt.…”
Section: Alternative Blended Learning Model (Superficial Model)mentioning
confidence: 99%