2021
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Evaluation of Smear Layer Removal by Using Four Different Irrigation Solutions like Root Canal Irrigants: An In Vitro SEM Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, EDTA 17% at pH 7.4 shows to be effective at 15 min over pulpal calcifications. EDTA solutions, made in different concentrations are considered to be the slowest, but the most reliable demineralizers, due to their neutral pH, the etching and erosive potential are thought to be minimal (Mankeliya et al, 2021; Muana et al, 2021; Petrović et al, 2015; Spencer et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, EDTA 17% at pH 7.4 shows to be effective at 15 min over pulpal calcifications. EDTA solutions, made in different concentrations are considered to be the slowest, but the most reliable demineralizers, due to their neutral pH, the etching and erosive potential are thought to be minimal (Mankeliya et al, 2021; Muana et al, 2021; Petrović et al, 2015; Spencer et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%