2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-008-8111-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Evaluation of Three Washing Procedures for Minimizing Exogenous Trace Element Contamination in Fetal Scalp Hair of Various Obstetric Outcomes

Abstract: A comparative evaluation of three washing methods for removing exogenous elemental contamination from fetal scalp hair is described. A total of 12 samples, including 6 from normal pregnancies and 6 from abruptio placentae (AP) cases, were used. Each was divided into four subsamples, with one left unwashed for comparison, while three were subjected to one of the three washing methods. The first consisted of agitating hair for 5 min in sequential and equal measures (30 ml) of acetone and water, followed by rinsi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hair has been considered to be suitable for comparative studies of environmental exposure of different age groups and populations [41]; however, metal levels measured can be an undefined and non-uniform combination of endogenous and exogenous metal amounts, depending on washing methods applied before analysis [42]. These complications make methods’ standardization difficult, increase variability of results, and cause problems with interpretation [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hair has been considered to be suitable for comparative studies of environmental exposure of different age groups and populations [41]; however, metal levels measured can be an undefined and non-uniform combination of endogenous and exogenous metal amounts, depending on washing methods applied before analysis [42]. These complications make methods’ standardization difficult, increase variability of results, and cause problems with interpretation [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other elements have been also measured in hair and references values have been proposed in specific populations [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] However, the use of hair analysis has several limitations. One problem relies in the difficulty to distinguish between endogenous (absorbed into the blood and incorporated into the hair) and exogenous contamination (derived from external contamination) [23,24]. Other difficulties come from the absence of reliable background reference ranges for the different populations due to lack of reproducibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hair is considered to be suitable for comparative studies of environmental exposure in different age groups and populations; however, measured metal levels can be an undefined and nonuniform combination of endogenous and exogenous metals, depending on the washing methods applied before 67, 68 Such complications pose problems with methods standardization, increased result variability, and data interpretation. 69 A CDC Expert Advisory Panel, in a bid to address these challenges, concluded that there is insufficient knowledge concerning the use of hair for the evaluation of exposure, along with a lack of adequate baseline or background values for populations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%