1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-5910(98)00210-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative experimental study of five multivariable control strategies applied to a grinding plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These control methods involve decentralized PID control and model predictive control (MPC) (Pomerleau, Hodouin, Desbiens, & Gagnon, 2000;Ramasamy, Narayanan, & Rao, 2005), multivariable control (Duarte et al, 1999), robust control (Galan, Barton, & Romagndi, 2002), supervisory control (Radhakrishnan, 1999) and neurocontrol (Conradle & Aldrich, 2001). Although numerous advanced control strategies have been reported in control literatures, both at simulation, as well as experimental levels, very few of these currently operate in industry due to the complex process dynamics and severe disturbances in grinding circuits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These control methods involve decentralized PID control and model predictive control (MPC) (Pomerleau, Hodouin, Desbiens, & Gagnon, 2000;Ramasamy, Narayanan, & Rao, 2005), multivariable control (Duarte et al, 1999), robust control (Galan, Barton, & Romagndi, 2002), supervisory control (Radhakrishnan, 1999) and neurocontrol (Conradle & Aldrich, 2001). Although numerous advanced control strategies have been reported in control literatures, both at simulation, as well as experimental levels, very few of these currently operate in industry due to the complex process dynamics and severe disturbances in grinding circuits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%