2013
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-12-3956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Genomic Approach for Identifying Synthetic Lethal Interactions in Human Cancer

Abstract: Synthetic lethal interactions enable a novel approach for discovering specific genetic vulnerabilities in cancer cells that can be exploited for the development of therapeutics. Despite successes in model organisms such as yeast, discovering synthetic lethal interactions on a large scale in human cells remains a significant challenge. We describe a comparative genomic strategy for identifying cancer relevant synthetic lethal interactions whereby candidate interactions are prioritized based on genetic interacti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attempts have been made to use biocomputational modeling approaches to infer relationships of biochemical/genetic redundancy between tumor suppressor genes and potential drug targets [67]. With the integration of the plentiful genetic and biochemical data from yeast [68], such approaches are becoming increasingly sophisticated.…”
Section: Collateral Lethality: Synthetic Lethal Targeting Of Passengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts have been made to use biocomputational modeling approaches to infer relationships of biochemical/genetic redundancy between tumor suppressor genes and potential drug targets [67]. With the integration of the plentiful genetic and biochemical data from yeast [68], such approaches are becoming increasingly sophisticated.…”
Section: Collateral Lethality: Synthetic Lethal Targeting Of Passengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the model organism approach is inherently limited to testing interactions of genes that are evolutionarily conserved, numerous such interactions have been observed, especially in the core conserved pathways in which TSGs are known to operate such as cell cycle, genome maintenance and metabolic growth (Roguev et al, 2008; Ryan et al, 2012). A number of TSGs important for human cancer were first identified and studied in yeast (Deshpande et al, 2013; Huang et al, 2003), which also provides an accessible model system in which to study mechanism of action (Simon et al, 2000). Nonetheless, it remains unclear to what extent synthetic lethal interactions observed in a model species can be ultimately translated for clinical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, SL interactions between RAD54B and SOD1 have been mapped from yeast to humans, with the inhibition of SOD1 leading to apoptosis in RAD54B-deficient colorectal cancer cells [30]. Also, systematic orthology mapping of yeast interactions has identified a SL relation between the tumor suppressor gene SMARCB1 and PSMA4, and another between alveolar soft-part sarcoma-associated ASPSCR1 and PSMC2 [31]. By translating yeast interaction data, PP2A has been identified as a potential target due to its SDL relation with the spindle checkpoint protein MAD2, which is often overexpressed in cancer [27].…”
Section: Exploiting Tumor Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 98%