2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(00)90226-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative immunohistochemical study of MART-1 expression in Spitz nevi, ordinary melanocytic nevi, and malignant melanomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, it differentiate between benign and malignant nevocellular forms, and is rarely expressed in melanoma metastases or in desmoplastic and spindle‐cell melanomas. As the probability of melanoma decreases (even more that that of nevocellular or Spitz nevus) with increasing tumour depth, it appears that MART‐1/melan‐A positivity reflects the greater immunogenicity of these melanocytic nevi, with respect to melanoma, and thus their greater capacity for eliciting a defensive response 23 . From a prognostic point of view, it would be interesting to see how the expression of this marker correlates with the characteristics of the reactive lymphocytic infiltrate (i.e.…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, it differentiate between benign and malignant nevocellular forms, and is rarely expressed in melanoma metastases or in desmoplastic and spindle‐cell melanomas. As the probability of melanoma decreases (even more that that of nevocellular or Spitz nevus) with increasing tumour depth, it appears that MART‐1/melan‐A positivity reflects the greater immunogenicity of these melanocytic nevi, with respect to melanoma, and thus their greater capacity for eliciting a defensive response 23 . From a prognostic point of view, it would be interesting to see how the expression of this marker correlates with the characteristics of the reactive lymphocytic infiltrate (i.e.…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Currently, there are no immunohistochemical studies or molecular biology techniques that can be used to make an entirely safe diagnosis of Spitz nevus or melanoma in problematic cases, although many attempts have been made to do so. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Histopathological study continues to be the gold standard for Spitz nevus diagnosis, although in some rare cases, even expert dermatopathologists do not guarantee safe diagnosis. 10 In the present work, 349 cases of unequivocal Spitz nevi were studied and their clinical and histopathological characteristics reviewed to establish the most reliable histopathological criteria to diagnose Spitz nevus and their possible relationship with clinical parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,7,8,19,20 Within a short period of time after their introduction, A103/M2-7C10 and T311 have become popular markers for diagnostic use in pathology, especially for the workup of amelanotic metastatic tumors and detection of micrometastases in sentinel lymph node of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma. [1][2][3]6,[10][11][12][13][14]17,28 The mAb D5 may also be helpful in selected settings, but its staining profile is less restricted to melanocytes than T311 and A103/M2-7C10 5,22,24,25,28 because the antibody was generated to a protein derived from the consensus region shared by various isoforms of microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF). Only one isoform (MITF-M) is melanocyte-specific.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%