2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0955-2219(01)00280-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative investigation of chromium deposition at air electrodes of solid oxide fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical reaction between Cr species and the cathode material has been proposed to be a main poisoning mechanism in the literature 4,[8][9] and the objective of the work is to develop both the methodology and a fundamental understanding of the poisoning mechanisms by investigating the correlation between the material degradation and the intrinsic Cr/LSCF interaction modes operating at the nanometer scale and below. As a result, the poisoning strategy adopted in this work was impregnating the LSCF 6428 cathode with a Cr stock solution of 1.22 mol l -1 as employed in a previous study 5 , in order to allow for a direct reaction between Cr species and LSCF that could lead to a rapid and significant poisoning effect.…”
Section: Cr Poisoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chemical reaction between Cr species and the cathode material has been proposed to be a main poisoning mechanism in the literature 4,[8][9] and the objective of the work is to develop both the methodology and a fundamental understanding of the poisoning mechanisms by investigating the correlation between the material degradation and the intrinsic Cr/LSCF interaction modes operating at the nanometer scale and below. As a result, the poisoning strategy adopted in this work was impregnating the LSCF 6428 cathode with a Cr stock solution of 1.22 mol l -1 as employed in a previous study 5 , in order to allow for a direct reaction between Cr species and LSCF that could lead to a rapid and significant poisoning effect.…”
Section: Cr Poisoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on the mechanisms of Cr deposition have proposed that the process is a chemical reaction between Cr (VI) with active elements in the electrode material such as Sr in LSCF [8][9] , more than an electrochemical reduction process in competition with O2 reduction [10][11] . The Cr rich phases, in the case of LSCF, have been suggested to be mainly SrCrO4 with a minor Cr2O3 impurity from bulk analysis using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDX) 8,[12][13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Cr-poisoning, caused by evaporating Cr from such metallic interconnects, has been identified as very detrimental for the functioning of the state-of-the-art (SoA) SOFC cathodes. This resulted in performance degradation [9][10][11][12][13], impeding the required 40,000 hours operation of the IT-SOFC system.…”
Section: Prefacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corrugated Fe-Cralloyed metallic interconnect fulfills all these stringent requirements. [18] A drawback of the use of the ferritic stainless steels is the Cr evaporation from Fe-Cr interconnects resulting in Cr-poisoning of the SOFC cathodes, which leads to a serious performance deterioration (loss of the electrical power output P el ) [4,6,[9][10][11][12][13]]. …”
Section: It-sofc Stacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation