2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6031(02)00092-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative method for developing vapor pressure curves based on evaporation data obtained from a simultaneous TG–DTA unit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vapor pressure of the amorphous alloys was calculated using the weight loss rate measured by TGA. Conventional TGA equipment was previously used to estimate the vapor pressure of materials at atmospheric pressure [24,25]. According to previous reports, Equation (1) was proposed to estimate the vapor pressure from the evaporation rate, adapting the Knudsen-Langmuir equation that describes free evaporation in a vacuum, as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vapor pressure of the amorphous alloys was calculated using the weight loss rate measured by TGA. Conventional TGA equipment was previously used to estimate the vapor pressure of materials at atmospheric pressure [24,25]. According to previous reports, Equation (1) was proposed to estimate the vapor pressure from the evaporation rate, adapting the Knudsen-Langmuir equation that describes free evaporation in a vacuum, as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 compares the experimentally obtained vaporization mass loss curve of the tar with the constructed evaporative mass loss curves of hypothetical tar compounds with molecular weights of 150, 250, 450, 650 and 750 g/mol. During the last decade, several papers have been published describing application of standard thermogravimetric techniques for vapor pressure measurement [8,9]. This application utilizes the Langmuir equation for evaporation and states that the vapor pressure is proportional to the thermogravimetric mass loss rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phang et al proposed a comparative method whereby a material of known, but similar structure and volatility, was run against the target compound so that a variable calibration "constant" could be employed [42]. Surov reported that the evaporation coefficient depended slightly on the compound being measured [55], although the data presented here in Table 1 does not cover a sufficient variety of compounds to support or refute this observation.…”
Section: Further Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The approach described above was adopted by Dollimore et al resulting in a series of publications on the technique by re-defining or modifying the calibration protocol [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. However, our original intent was not to measure vapour pressures but to determine the enthalpy of vaporisation (DH vap ) of dyes and UV absorbers in order to screen them for a solid-state dye diffusion process [2,48] since the solubilities in target substrates are governed by the cohesive energy density (d) [49]:…”
Section: Further Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation