2023
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Multicenter Cohort Study Evaluating the Long-Term Influence of the Strict Lockdown during the First COVID-19 Wave on Lung Cancer Patients (ARTEMISIA Trial)

Olivier Molinier,
Camille Guguen,
Marie Marcq
et al.

Abstract: The consequences of the strict health restrictions during the first wave of COVID-19 on lung cancer (LC) patients are not known. This cohort study evaluated the impact of the initial lockdown on management of and long-term outcome in LC patients. This exposed–unexposed-type study included two evaluation periods of 6 months each in non-selected patients; one began on the first day of lockdown in 2020, and the other in 2019 during the same calendar period. Various indicators were compared: clinical profiles, man… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial modeling of the impact of mitigating viral spread and protecting hospital staff and resources through restrictions foresaw significant changes in cancer severity presentation, with consequent increased morbidity and mortality. Estimates varied according to cancer type [21][22][23]. However, modeling was reported to be difficult, given the heterogeneity of recommendations and responses worldwide [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial modeling of the impact of mitigating viral spread and protecting hospital staff and resources through restrictions foresaw significant changes in cancer severity presentation, with consequent increased morbidity and mortality. Estimates varied according to cancer type [21][22][23]. However, modeling was reported to be difficult, given the heterogeneity of recommendations and responses worldwide [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%