2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-021-03255-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative numerical study of scramjet intake systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students always read without any new word barriers, and are always in a passive and receptive position, unable to take the initiative. Therefore, when explaining new knowledge points, teachers can further understand the learning status of each student through timely communication with students, avoid students from memorizing too much, and strengthen the communication between teachers and students, so that students can continuously improve their learning awareness in a harmonious and interesting atmosphere [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students always read without any new word barriers, and are always in a passive and receptive position, unable to take the initiative. Therefore, when explaining new knowledge points, teachers can further understand the learning status of each student through timely communication with students, avoid students from memorizing too much, and strengthen the communication between teachers and students, so that students can continuously improve their learning awareness in a harmonious and interesting atmosphere [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of symmetrical models has a low product of inertia, making the development of control systems easier [12]. Additionally, internal compression systems shows lightly higher adiabatic compression efficiency and kinetic efficiency than mixed systems [13], and despite the more complex fluxes, the shock structures tend to interact less when submitted on transverse fuel injection schemes with adequate positioning of the injectors, producing high levels of chemical activity and OH production in the supersonic combustion process [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, some analysis over scramjet demonstrators based on internal intake systems have been performed by analytical [19][20][21][22], experimental [12] and numerical [13] techniques. Different intake geometries to be applied in scramjet engine demonstrators to operate in a speed range corresponding to Mach number from 5.79 to 6.8 at 20 km to 30 km of altitude were studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%