2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative review between amines and ammonia as sorptive media for post-combustion CO2 capture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
93
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
1
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main advantages of NH 3 over amine-based solvents have been recently reviewed by Shakerian et al [29] and are: commercial availability at lower price; higher CO 2 absorption capacity compared to the MEA solution of the same concentration; lower heat of reaction resulting in lower heat requirement for solvent regeneration; projected efficiency penalty as low as 4.1-7.0% points [30][31][32], which is yet to be substantiated experimentally [33], though efficiency penalty has been determined to be between 8.5% and 11.6% points [5]; no solvent degradation on contact with the flue gas components; stripper can be operated at elevated pressure/temperature, leading to less compression work required; NH 3 is not as corrosive as amines and can be used as a multicomponent capture solvent [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantages of NH 3 over amine-based solvents have been recently reviewed by Shakerian et al [29] and are: commercial availability at lower price; higher CO 2 absorption capacity compared to the MEA solution of the same concentration; lower heat of reaction resulting in lower heat requirement for solvent regeneration; projected efficiency penalty as low as 4.1-7.0% points [30][31][32], which is yet to be substantiated experimentally [33], though efficiency penalty has been determined to be between 8.5% and 11.6% points [5]; no solvent degradation on contact with the flue gas components; stripper can be operated at elevated pressure/temperature, leading to less compression work required; NH 3 is not as corrosive as amines and can be used as a multicomponent capture solvent [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] This typeo fm edia overcomes the limitedp hysical solubility of CO 2 in water by chemically capturing it as ac arbamate, as discussed below.E ven thoughn umerous studies have been conducted to furthero ptimize this amine-based capturet echnology, [18] to our knowledge, no studies on the use of amine-basedm ediai ne lectro-chemicalC O 2 conversion have been reported. [17] This typeo fm edia overcomes the limitedp hysical solubility of CO 2 in water by chemically capturing it as ac arbamate, as discussed below.E ven thoughn umerous studies have been conducted to furthero ptimize this amine-based capturet echnology, [18] to our knowledge, no studies on the use of amine-basedm ediai ne lectro-chemicalC O 2 conversion have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organic absorbents for CO 2 capture include chemical absorbents (e.g., alkanolamines, amino acid salts, ionic liquids) and physical absorbents (e.g., selexol). Of these, alkanolamines and amino acid salts can be prepared from biomass . Although CO 2 absorption performance of commercial alkanolamines and amino acid salts including the reaction thermodynamics and kinetics have extensively been reviewed, few reports on the CO 2 absorption performance of renewable alkanolamines and amino acid salts were found in the open literature.…”
Section: Inorganic Renewable Absorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%