2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ugj.2021.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative review of urban climate governance in Chinese and Western contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In both theory and practice, UCR frameworks serve diverse objectives and are broadly categorized into two types [47]: one evaluates local government performance within global climate governance networks (e.g., network governance framework [48] and Urban Climate Change Governance Survey [49]); the other identifies critical barriers and challenges to the development and institutionalization of urban governance systems, (e.g., urban governance for adaptation [50]). Tyler and Moench (2012), upon reviewing UCR concepts and theories based on the Rockefeller-Foundation-funded Asian Cities Climate Change Network foundation, introduced a governance assessment framework centered on systemic access, agents' decision-making, and institutional information flow and learning [51].…”
Section: Framework For Ucr Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both theory and practice, UCR frameworks serve diverse objectives and are broadly categorized into two types [47]: one evaluates local government performance within global climate governance networks (e.g., network governance framework [48] and Urban Climate Change Governance Survey [49]); the other identifies critical barriers and challenges to the development and institutionalization of urban governance systems, (e.g., urban governance for adaptation [50]). Tyler and Moench (2012), upon reviewing UCR concepts and theories based on the Rockefeller-Foundation-funded Asian Cities Climate Change Network foundation, introduced a governance assessment framework centered on systemic access, agents' decision-making, and institutional information flow and learning [51].…”
Section: Framework For Ucr Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GH transition is the basis of China's adoption of a "low-carbon society" development model. At present, the prominent terminology such as "carbon peak" and "carbon neutral" re ect that the Chinese government has put forward higher requirements for the construction industry (Liu & Lo, 2021a, 2021b. Therefore, these changes indicate that market participants will have to grapple with a signi cant policy change.…”
Section: Gh Strategies and Policies In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Más recientemente se debate también aquella vinculada con la mitigación del cambio climático y la adaptación (Heinen, Arlati y Knieling, 2021). Esta, dada su complejidad y por la incertidumbre que genera, plantea nuevos retos de gobernanza (Liu y Lo, 2021), al tiempo que representa un enfoque prometedor para mejorar la gobernanza de la adaptación al clima (Munaretto, Siciliano y Turvani, 2014). En este último caso el enfoque se basa principalmente en perspectivas de gobernanza policéntrica y multinivel -i.e., la cooperación de actores gubernamentales situados en diferentes jurisdicciones y niveles de gobernanza), en red -i.e.,la colaboración entre actores públicos y privados para dirigir la acción colectiva-; y la experimental -i.e., intervenciones basadas en el ensayo y el error para generar nuevas soluciones climáticas (Heinen et al, 2021;Liu y Lo, 2021).…”
Section: Gobernanza Sistemas Alimentarios Y Sostenibilidad En Espacio...unclassified