2020
DOI: 10.3855/jidc.13034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study between a single-dose and 24-hour multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for elective hysterectomy

Abstract: Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major health issue in surgical specialties in terms of health care costs and patients’ clinical outcomes. At the level of the patient, prolonged hospital stays or readmissions for SSIs, can affect the patient’s quality of life. At the level of the health care system, it exhausts the hospital’s resources and increases the burden on the medical staff due to the need for continuous wound care, microbiological cultures, laboratory tests and medications. In this s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the antibiotic recommendation guidelines, our finding was only 1.75% which appropriate selection of antibiotic prophylaxis in caesarean section procedure which the drug of choice should be cefazolin. Antibiotic prophylactic substantially drops infection after surgery and diminishes length of stay of women who undergoing hysterectomy (20). This facts were supported and proven with more than 30 prospective randomized clinical trial and two meta-analyses in decrease infections (21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Based on the antibiotic recommendation guidelines, our finding was only 1.75% which appropriate selection of antibiotic prophylaxis in caesarean section procedure which the drug of choice should be cefazolin. Antibiotic prophylactic substantially drops infection after surgery and diminishes length of stay of women who undergoing hysterectomy (20). This facts were supported and proven with more than 30 prospective randomized clinical trial and two meta-analyses in decrease infections (21).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%