2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2009.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study Between Corresponding Structural Geometric Variables Using 2 Commonly Implemented Hip Structural Analysis Algorithms Applied to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are inherent limitations in attempts to assess three‐dimensional structure from two‐dimensional images. Two‐dimensional DXA structural geometrical variables dependent on mass calibration standards and mathematical derivation techniques are different from three‐dimensional QCT variables . However, correlations between measured variables between DXA and QCT range from moderate to high (0.73 to 0.90), substantiating the assumptions underlying the HSA approach and increasing confidence that 2D HSA replicates the 3D measures .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…There are inherent limitations in attempts to assess three‐dimensional structure from two‐dimensional images. Two‐dimensional DXA structural geometrical variables dependent on mass calibration standards and mathematical derivation techniques are different from three‐dimensional QCT variables . However, correlations between measured variables between DXA and QCT range from moderate to high (0.73 to 0.90), substantiating the assumptions underlying the HSA approach and increasing confidence that 2D HSA replicates the 3D measures .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The Hologic version of HSA and the HSA software provided by Prof. Beck for various research studies have been shown to be highly correlated by Khoo et.al. [16] in an independent study utilizing a fan beam Hologic densitometer equivalent to the one used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the narrow neck of the proximal femur, APEX 3 utilises a tubular model with a 0.6 cortical to trabecular ratio [8,9]. In a previous study [10], good correlations (R>0.8) were seen between HSA calculated with APEX and HSA calculated by the program provided by Prof. Thomas Beck of the Johns Hopkins University.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 98%