2021
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study between outcomes of an in‐person versus online introductory field course

Abstract: In their traditional in-person formats, field courses are an important tool for retention, success, and equity in science majors, especially for underrepresented minorities (URM) (Beltran et al., 2020). These benefits emerge from the many positive factors impacted by field courses including self-efficacy (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, there are a variety of online teaching techniques exist [12]. Some research has been done that compares online versus in person learning [13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, this research is limited with only a few results.…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, there are a variety of online teaching techniques exist [12]. Some research has been done that compares online versus in person learning [13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, this research is limited with only a few results.…”
Section: Background Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the World Health Organization (WHO) declared COVID-19 a pandemic, higher education institutions worked quickly to move from in-person courses to emergency remote learning (temporary shift of instructional delivery to an alternative mode due to a crisis; Hodges et al 2020). Once the COVID-19 pandemic started, instructors that were not already teaching online struggled to make laboratories accessible remotely and to continue to give students authentic, hands-on experiences (Race et al 2021;Barton 2020;Bacon and Peacock 2021). Laboratory course instructors struggled to find ways to continue inquiry-based, hands-on, and field experiences when the students had to move off campus, and everyone had restrictions in place with stay-at-home orders (Race et al 2021;Barton 2020;Bacon and Peacock 2021).…”
Section: Emergency Remote Learning and Laboratoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the COVID-19 pandemic started, instructors that were not already teaching online struggled to make laboratories accessible remotely and to continue to give students authentic, hands-on experiences (Race et al 2021;Barton 2020;Bacon and Peacock 2021). Laboratory course instructors struggled to find ways to continue inquiry-based, hands-on, and field experiences when the students had to move off campus, and everyone had restrictions in place with stay-at-home orders (Race et al 2021;Barton 2020;Bacon and Peacock 2021). One way we overcame these limitations of remote learning was to incorporate citizen science, specifically Budburst (Budburst 2020), into our remote teaching version of our introductory biology laboratory courses.…”
Section: Emergency Remote Learning and Laboratoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kastens et al (2009) note the value of guided apprenticeship between field instructors and students, which can be especially difficult to achieve in virtual field experiences that are designed for student-centered inquiry (Jacobson et al, 2009;Mead et al., 2019). In addition, aspects of community building and student integration into a community of practice can be lacking in virtual field experiences (Mogk and Goodwin, 2012;Race et al, 2021). However, Orion and Hofstein (1994) note the importance of limiting novelty space in field experiences, which can be somewhat addressed with virtual introductions to learning in the field.…”
Section: Implementing Virtual Field Tripsmentioning
confidence: 99%