2017 6th International Conference on Systems and Control (ICSC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icosc.2017.7958655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study between the MCSA, DWT and the vibration analysis methods to diagnose the dynamic eccentricity fault in induction motors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sağlam motorun %100 yük altında stator akımı güç spektral yoğunluğu (Bessous, 2017). Bu çalışmada motorun tam yük çalışma hızı f r = 47,5 olarak ölçülmüştür.…”
Section: şEkilunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sağlam motorun %100 yük altında stator akımı güç spektral yoğunluğu (Bessous, 2017). Bu çalışmada motorun tam yük çalışma hızı f r = 47,5 olarak ölçülmüştür.…”
Section: şEkilunclassified
“…Sağlam motorun %100 yük altında stator akımı güç spektral yoğunluğu Eksenle kaçıklık arızası karakteristik titreşim sinyalleri kxf r frekanslarında görülür (Hegde ve Maruthi, 2012), (Polat, 2015), (Li ve diğ. 2015), Faiz ve Moosavi, 2016), (Bessous, 2017). Bu çalışmada motorun tam yük çalışma hızı f r = 47,5 olarak ölçülmüştür.…”
Section: şEkilunclassified
“…During the latest years the detection of the eccentricity fault in IMs has gathered great efforts from the scientific community. In fact, it has been proposed the acquisition and analysis of a wide variety of physical variables of the IM such as the magnetic stray flux [4,5] or vibrations [6] among others. Nevertheless, their use has several drawbacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different techniques that can be used for implementing a CBM system for IMs [19], such as the analysis of currents [20][21][22][23][24], vibrations [24][25][26][27], instantaneous power [28], reactive power [29], apparent power [21], voltages [30,31], back EMFs induced tooth-coil windings [32,33], voltage injection [34], thermal images [35,36], internal flux [37,38], acoustic emissions [39,40], etc. Among these methods, the analysis of the machine current signature (MCSA) method has attracted an special interest [24,41], because it is non invasive (it requires only a current probe that can be attached to the line which feeds the machine), fast an easy to implement online (it uses a FFT to obtain the current spectrum, where the characteristic fault signatures can be detected), and is able to detect different, and possibly simultaneous [42][43][44], types of faults, and it can be operated on line. In spite of its conceptual simplicity, the practical application of MCSA in harsh industrial environments is a challenging issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%