2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study Between Traditional Microscopic Surgeries and Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Skull Base Chordomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve maximal resection, MLOA was still required in selected cases. We did not nd a signi cant difference in the GTR rate between EMA and MLOA, which was consistent with the previous ndings of our group and others [30,34,38]. This supports the philosophy that a team focusing on skull-base disease should master different approaches [1].…”
Section: Choice Of Surgical Approachsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To achieve maximal resection, MLOA was still required in selected cases. We did not nd a signi cant difference in the GTR rate between EMA and MLOA, which was consistent with the previous ndings of our group and others [30,34,38]. This supports the philosophy that a team focusing on skull-base disease should master different approaches [1].…”
Section: Choice Of Surgical Approachsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Adjuvant RT is a widely accepted treatment for residual chordomas [40,19], although no strong evidence supports it [31]. We found that PFS and CSS were signi cantly longer in patients with pre-recurrence RT than in other patients, which is similar to prior studies [14,34]. In addition, the PFS in the late-RT group was shortest in the present series (data not shown); however, the CSS was still longer than that of the patients who had no RT.…”
Section: Timing Of Rt and Outcomesupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A relatively recent meta-analysis could not detect significant differences between the 2 approaches [ 24 ]. This equivalence was recently confirmed in several retrospective comparisons [ 14 , 17 , 33 ]. After surgical resection, high-dose radiation therapy is therefore indicated and can improve overall survival and local control, and particle therapy is considered the radiation modality of choice [ 15 , 17 , 31 , 34 ].…”
Section: Established Treatment Strategymentioning
confidence: 55%