A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching?

Abstract

BackgroundAudience response devices, or “clickers”, have been used in the education of future healthcare professionals for several years with varying success. They have been reported to improve the learning experience by promoting engagement and knowledge retention. In 2014, our department evaluated the use of “clickers” in a newly introduced multidisciplinary approach to teaching large groups of third year medical students clinical cases developed around a microbiology theme.MethodsSix multidisciplinary teaching sessions covering community-acquired pneumonia, tuberculosis, infective endocarditis, peritonitis, bloodstream infection with pyelonephritis and bacterial meningitis were included in the study. Three involved the use of the “clickers” and three did not. Consenting undergraduate students attended the designated classes and afterwards answered a short online quiz relating to the session. Students also answered a short questionnaire about the “clickers” to gauge their attitudes on the use of these devices.ResultsOf 310 students, 294 (94.8%) agreed to participate in the study. Interestingly, the grades of online quizzes after a session where a “clicker” was used were slightly lower. Looking only at the grades of students who engaged completely with the process (n = 19), there was no statistical difference to suggest that the devices had a positive or negative impact on knowledge retention. However, student attitudes to using the devices were positive overall. Fifty-five percent strongly agreed and 27% agreed that teaching sessions where the “clickers” were used were more engaging. Thirty-four percent strongly agreed and 36% agreed that the “clickers” made important concepts more memorable and 54% felt the device enhanced their understanding of the topic being covered.ConclusionsOverall, it appears that “clickers” help in improving student engagement in large classroom environments, enhance the learning experience, and are received positively by medical students but their impact on knowledge retention is variable.

Phone-based audience response system as an adjunct in orthodontic teaching of undergraduate dental students: a cross-over randomised controlled trial

“…A study has shown that PB-ARS provides the students with a safe teaching environment due to the anonymity of the users [23]. Other studies have reported that the use of clickers in the classroom improved students' attention during the lectures [24,25]. Nevertheless, a previous study conducted in 2006 found that while the implementation of ARS might encounter di culty in lecture preparation, the ARS fostered student participation [26].…”

How Do They Learn: Types and Characteristics of Medical Student Engagement in the Simulation-Based Learning Environment

“…Driven by this movement, educators begin to focus on medical student engagement in the IT-based learning environment. Most research focuses on the effect of using IT in the objective physical environment and the impact of teaching methods on student engagement which include classroom mobile technology [16], online learning aids [17], online test [18], visualized virtual patient [19], audience response system [20], role-play-based simulation [21], etc. Many of the existing studies including those listed above focus on the impact of IT on student engagement, but they have yet to conduct in-depth research on what and how student engagement itself has changed.…”

Can e-learning improve the performance of undergraduate medical students in Clinical Microbiology examinations?

“…Technology-enhanced learning (TEL) and online- or e-learning approaches are very popular in health professions education and they are often received positively by students who all have access to portable electronic devices and computers [5, 6]. This means students can study freely, in their own time and at their own pace.…”