2011
DOI: 10.5488/cmp.14.23701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study for structural and electronic properties of single-crystal ScN

Abstract: A comparative study by FP-LAPW calculations based on DFT within LDA, PBE-GGA, EVex-PWco-GGA, and EVex-GGA-LDAco schemes is introduced for the structural and electronic properties of ScN in RS, ZB, WZ, and CsCl phases. According to all approximations used in this work, the RS phase is the stable ground state structure and makes a transition to CsCl phase at high transition pressure. While PBE-GGA and EVex-PWco-GGA's have provided better structural features such as equilibrium lattice constant and bulk modulus, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(171 reference statements)
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FP-LAPW method with PBE-GGA is provided by WIEN2k package [25] and successfully used before for the determination of structural and electronic properties of low dimensional systems [26,27]. FP-LAPW calculations are outlined in our previous work [28]. The parameters of FP-LAPW calculations, particularly, R MT nK MAX , G MAX , l MAX , and cutoff energy are taken to be 7, 12 Ry, 15, and À 6.0 Ry, respectively, for all WZ-and ZB-structural GaP nanowires.…”
Section: Nanowire Structures and Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FP-LAPW method with PBE-GGA is provided by WIEN2k package [25] and successfully used before for the determination of structural and electronic properties of low dimensional systems [26,27]. FP-LAPW calculations are outlined in our previous work [28]. The parameters of FP-LAPW calculations, particularly, R MT nK MAX , G MAX , l MAX , and cutoff energy are taken to be 7, 12 Ry, 15, and À 6.0 Ry, respectively, for all WZ-and ZB-structural GaP nanowires.…”
Section: Nanowire Structures and Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is at the low end of previously reported values, which range from 0.9-1.5 eV from experimental studies 26,42,46,52 and 0.79-1.70 eV from theoretical investigations that go beyond the conventional local density or generalized gradient approximations. 29,42,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] Similarly, our value of 2.07±0.05 eV for the direct transition at the X-point is at the low end of reported measured values of the direct transition determined from optical absorption, ranging from 2.03 to 3.2 eV. 2,26,34,37,40,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48] We note that our samples, similar to the published literature, also yield quite a large range of measured optical gaps, from 2.18 to 2.70 eV.…”
Section: Computational Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32][33][34] However, more recent theoretical results with improved exchange correlation functionals predict a direct X-point transition of 1.82-2.59 eV and an indirect band gap of 0.79-1.70 eV. 29,42,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] These values are consistent with the experimental ranges of 2.03-3.2 eV and 0.9-1.5 eV for the direct and indirect transitions, respectively. However, the large ranges for gap values from both experimental and theoretical studies are unsatisfactory and motivate the present investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The parameters of FP-LAPW calculations, particularly, R MT Â K MAX , G MAX and l MAX are set to 7, 12 ffiffiffiffiffiffi ffi Ry p and 15, respectively, for all ZB-and WZ-structural GaAsP NWs. R MT values, smallest radii of the spheres around the atoms in the unit cell, are taken as 2.02, 1.94, 1.75 and 0.85 a.u.…”
Section: Calculation Methods and Nw Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%