2011
DOI: 10.1080/10589751003770100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study for the concrete compressive strength estimation using neural network and neuro-fuzzy modelling approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of the inference engine depends on the internal organization of the knowledge base. The fuzzy rules can express conclusions to be drawn by generalization from the qualitative information stored in the knowledge base with the natural language [19]. Mamdani implication was used to compute the individual output membership functions.…”
Section: For Each Rule Calculate the Individual Outputs (5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of the inference engine depends on the internal organization of the knowledge base. The fuzzy rules can express conclusions to be drawn by generalization from the qualitative information stored in the knowledge base with the natural language [19]. Mamdani implication was used to compute the individual output membership functions.…”
Section: For Each Rule Calculate the Individual Outputs (5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. Tesfamariam and H. Najjaran designed an adaptive network-fuzzy inference to estimate the concrete strength using mix design [24]. M. Bilgehan worked on a comparative study to estimate the concrete compressive strength using the neural network and the neuro-fuzzy modeling approaches [9]. M. L. Nehdi and M. T. Bassuoni found a Fuzzy logic approach to estimate durability of the concrete [6].…”
Section: Preview Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P i , A i andà i are the predicted, actual and averaged actual output of the network, respectively, and N is the total number of training patterns [49].…”
Section: Application Designmentioning
confidence: 99%