2018
DOI: 10.1142/s0129183118500663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of 2d Ising model at different boundary conditions using Cellular Automata

Abstract: Using Cellular Automata, we simulate spin systems corresponding to 2d Ising model with various kinds of boundary conditions (bcs). The appearance of spontaneous magnetization in the absence of magnetic field is studied with a 64 × 64 square lattice with five different bcs, i.e., periodic, adiabatic, reflexive, fixed (+1 or −1) bcs with three initial conditions (all spins up, all spins down and random orientation of spins). In the context of 2d Ising model, we have calculated the magnetisation, energy, specific… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated that the probabilistic model of the CA like Metropolis algorithm [24] is more realistic for description of the Ising model even though the random number generation makes it slower. Probabilistic CA model under five different boundary conditions has been studied in the context of a square-lattice Ising model [25]. However, Ising model using two dimensional hexagonal CA (HCA) under different bcs has not yet been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated that the probabilistic model of the CA like Metropolis algorithm [24] is more realistic for description of the Ising model even though the random number generation makes it slower. Probabilistic CA model under five different boundary conditions has been studied in the context of a square-lattice Ising model [25]. However, Ising model using two dimensional hexagonal CA (HCA) under different bcs has not yet been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%