2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.11.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of a label-free DNA capacitive sensor using a pyrrolidinyl peptide nucleic acid probe immobilized through polyphenylenediamine and polytyramine non-conducting polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acpcPNA probes are also used to achieve a highly sensitive label-free capacitive DNA sensor (Thipmanee et al, 2012). A comparative study has been reported on the performance of a label-free capacitive DNA sensor making the use of the pyrrolidinyl PNA probe which is immobilized through the polyphenylenediamine and the polytyramine nonconducting polymers (Sankoh et al, 2013). Numerous PNA probes combined with nanomaterials have also been designed to develop biosensors.…”
Section: Application In Sensor Probementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acpcPNA probes are also used to achieve a highly sensitive label-free capacitive DNA sensor (Thipmanee et al, 2012). A comparative study has been reported on the performance of a label-free capacitive DNA sensor making the use of the pyrrolidinyl PNA probe which is immobilized through the polyphenylenediamine and the polytyramine nonconducting polymers (Sankoh et al, 2013). Numerous PNA probes combined with nanomaterials have also been designed to develop biosensors.…”
Section: Application In Sensor Probementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, biosensor systems based on electrochemical techniques, such as chronoamperometry [ 20 ], capacitance [ 21 , 22 ], and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) [ 20 ], have been shown to be of great utility due to their sensibility and low cost [ 23 , 24 ]. By detecting changes that occur during hybridization at the interface between a DNA functionalized electrode and a conductive target analyte solution, electrochemical techniques have the potential to provide real-time measurement, label-free sensing, and more portable detection platforms [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, different immobilization layers have been used for the fabrication of biosensor gold sensor chip surfaces. The most reported immobilization layers for the fabrication of biosensor gold sensor chip surfaces are both conducting polymers, for example, polypyrrole [1][2][3][4], and non-conducting polymers, for example, polytyramine (Pty) [5][6][7][8][9][10]; as well as self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of mercapto-containing organosilanes [11][12][13][14][15][16] and organosulfur compounds [17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While polymers are characterized by their good insulation, making them useful for capacitive systems, SAMs are well known for their orderly self-organizing behavior, maximizing the availability of the active groups for the immobilization of bio-recognition molecules. Although both non-conducting polymers (polytyramine) and hydroxyl-terminated SAMs (6-mercaptohexanol) have been extensively used as sensor chip modification layers in capacitive biosensor systems [5][6][7][8][9][10], there are no comprehensive studies comparing the two layers to document/establish sound scientific evidence of the superiority/suitability of one layer over the other for capacitive DNA sensor measurements. Such a comprehensive comparison study will provide sound scientific guidance in selecting a sensor chip modification layer for capacitive biosensor systems, achieving ultrasensitive clinical assays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%