2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03732-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of abstractive and extractive summarization techniques to label subgroups on patent dataset

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basis of computational intelligence can also be understood as the continuous evolution of structures. Since the birth of intelligent computing, its powerful intelligence, robustness, and self-adaptability have attracted the attention of many researchers, and great breakthroughs have been made in both theoretical research and practical applications of algorithms [ 8 ]. Kolomvatsos and Anagnostopoulos proposed a simple two-way short- and long-term memory network intelligent computing IoT algorithm for recommendation classification or nonrecommendation, which predicts the outcome by the average semantic of specific phrases in home education, with an average accuracy of 74% in the final experiment [ 9 ].…”
Section: Current Status Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basis of computational intelligence can also be understood as the continuous evolution of structures. Since the birth of intelligent computing, its powerful intelligence, robustness, and self-adaptability have attracted the attention of many researchers, and great breakthroughs have been made in both theoretical research and practical applications of algorithms [ 8 ]. Kolomvatsos and Anagnostopoulos proposed a simple two-way short- and long-term memory network intelligent computing IoT algorithm for recommendation classification or nonrecommendation, which predicts the outcome by the average semantic of specific phrases in home education, with an average accuracy of 74% in the final experiment [ 9 ].…”
Section: Current Status Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Words are connected, so the longdistance dependence feature is greatly shortened, and its maximum path length is 1, which can capture long-distance dependence. e text data within a certain sliding window is converted into a fixed-length vector B'' by the Softmax function, and then the feature data is fed into a linear SVM classifier for training and outputting the sentiment classification results, which is calculated by equation (8), where C denotes the training error of the SVM classifier, W and H denote the final obtained weight matrix and bias value, respectively, and L denotes the loss function.…”
Section: F(x)fax(sam(x)) �mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors experiment with inputting [the purpose of the present invention is] to retrieve and extract the patent aim. Finally, de Souza et al (2021) have compared extractive and abstractive models in naming patents' subgroups. When used to "summarize" the Abstract to produce a patent Title -which should Model R-1 R-2 R-L TextRank (Mihalcea & Tarau, 2004) 35.99 11.14 29.60 LexRank (Erkan & Radev, 2004) 35.57 10.47 29.03 SumBasic (Nenkova & Vanderwende, 2005) 27.44 7.08 23.66 RNN-ext RL (Chen & Bansal, 2018b) 34.63 10.62 29.43 LSTM seq2seq (Sutskever et al, 2014) + attention 28.74 7.87 24.66 Pointer-Generator (See et al, 2017) 30.59 10.01 25.65 Pointer-Generator + coverage (See et al, 2017) 33.14 11.63 28.55 SentRewriting (Chen & Bansal, 2018a) 37.12 11.87 32.45 TLM (Pilault et al, 2020) 36 For BIGBIRD, results using RoBERTa's (MLM) and a Pegasus' (Gap Sentence Generation) pre-training are considered.…”
Section: Abstractive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of abstractive summarization and patent generation, some works (de Souza et al, 2021;Lee, 2020) highlight that ROUGE is unable to find semantically similar sentences expressed in different wording. In the context of Natural Language Generation, some new measures have recently been proposed to solve these issues.…”
Section: Current and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These standard taxonomies consist of complex hierarchical structures that cover all technology areas and help maintain inter-operability among various patent offices worldwide (Gomez & Moens, 2014). Therefore, accurate automated classification of patent documents is critical and will help experts manage patent documents, facilitate reliable patent search and retrieval, reduce the risk of missing a relevant patent in preventing patent infringement, and further patent analysis tasks (Yun & Geum, 2020;Souza et al, 2020;Gomez & Moens, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%