2002
DOI: 10.1111/1368-423x.t01-1-00094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of alternative estimators for the unbalanced two‐way error component regression model

Abstract: This paper considers the unbalanced two-way error component model studied by Wansbeek and Kapteyn (1989). Alternative analysis of variance (ANOVA), minimum norm quadratic unbiased and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation procedures are proposed. The mean squared error performance of these estimators are compared using Monte Carlo experiments. Results show that for the estimates of the variance components, the computationally more demanding maximum likelihood (ML) and minimum variance quadratic unbia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
70
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The composition of the sample allows the combination of time series and cross sections with adequate opportunity to take advantage of the creation of a panel data, especially in the control of unobserved heterogeneity, i.e., the individual characteristics of each entity that are not observable but affect the variables under study (Arellano and Bover 1991;Arellano 1993;Himmelberg et al 1999;Palia 2001;Brick et al 2005). Additionally, since at present the idea of using unbalanced panels with total observations is widely accepted, the option of analyzing balanced panels with fewer companies is discarded because it may be conditioned by the survival bias (Baltagi and Chang 1994).…”
Section: Design and Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition of the sample allows the combination of time series and cross sections with adequate opportunity to take advantage of the creation of a panel data, especially in the control of unobserved heterogeneity, i.e., the individual characteristics of each entity that are not observable but affect the variables under study (Arellano and Bover 1991;Arellano 1993;Himmelberg et al 1999;Palia 2001;Brick et al 2005). Additionally, since at present the idea of using unbalanced panels with total observations is widely accepted, the option of analyzing balanced panels with fewer companies is discarded because it may be conditioned by the survival bias (Baltagi and Chang 1994).…”
Section: Design and Research Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We estimated standard errors for the one-way unbalanced data model using a specialization (Baltagi and Chang 1994) of the approach proposed by Wansbeek and Kapteyn (1989) for unbalanced two-way models. The Wansbeek and Kapteyn method for estimating variance components is the default approach used by SAS in the one-way random effects estimation of unbalanced panel data (SAS 2011b).…”
Section: Yr T Is a Time Trend In Years;mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that one can also include covariates in the model. In this case, a mixed-effects regression model could be used to estimate the regression coefficients and the variance components simultaneously (see for example Baltagi & Chang, 1994, for a discussion of the ANOVA estimates in such a model).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%