2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-022-03070-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of Artificial Intelligence Models and A Statistical Method for Groundwater Level Prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Humans are always looking for new methods to reach their goals quickly. Since the water challenge is one of the essential human concerns (Poursaeid, Poursaeid, et al 2022), scientists are also looking for new ways to solve human problems. For this reason, AI models are one of the latest scienti c developments and the most powerful approaches to solving complex problems (Parmar and Bhardwaj 2014).…”
Section: Aim and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Humans are always looking for new methods to reach their goals quickly. Since the water challenge is one of the essential human concerns (Poursaeid, Poursaeid, et al 2022), scientists are also looking for new ways to solve human problems. For this reason, AI models are one of the latest scienti c developments and the most powerful approaches to solving complex problems (Parmar and Bhardwaj 2014).…”
Section: Aim and Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it should be mentioned that EC is measured by a tool called an EC meter. According to WHO standards, the value of this index for water is less than or equal to 2500 µS/cm (Poursaeid, Poursaeid, et al 2022).…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity (Ec)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth mentioning that the MODFLOW models require a huge quantity of hydrological data and a long operational period [3], which has high requirements for users and also increases the problem of accurate simulations. In the last 20 years, artificial intelligence models have been widely applied to overcome the constraints of classical numerical models for GWL simulation [16]. Support vector machine (SVM) [17], artificial neural network (ANN) [18], random forest (RF) [19], and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems [20] are ML techniques that have been utilised in studies to forecast GWL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning-based methods, compared to numerical models, are accurate and capable of forecasting various variables despite their cost-effectiveness (Azari et al, 2021;Fatemi & Parvini, 2022;Zeynoddin et al, 2018). Some of the other research carried out on this topic within recent years is Poursaeid et al (2021Poursaeid et al ( , 2020; Yosefvand & Shabanlou (2020); Malekzadeh et al (2019); Azizpour et al (2021Azizpour et al ( , 2022; Poursaeid et al (2022); Zeinali et al (2020aZeinali et al ( , 2020b; and Bayesteh & Azari (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%