1999
DOI: 10.1080/095006999290093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of attitudes to the aims of practical work in science education in Egypt, Korea and the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the first six most important aims they nominated were: (i) to gain practice of making observations and descriptions of objects (7 respondents); (ii) to promote the method of reasoning and logical thinking in problemsolving (7 respondents); (iii) to make science more interesting and fun through current experiences (6); (iv) to make the biological/chemical phenomena more real through actual experience (6); (v) to verify or clarify events and principles already taught in tutorials explaining their relationship (6); and to discover facts and come up with new principles (6). These results differ to some extent from those indicated by the teachers in the Swain et al (1999) study. For instance, the Korean teachers indicated the five most important aims as follows: (i) for finding facts and arriving at new principles; (ii) as a creative activity; (iii) to verify facts and principles already taught; (iv) to elucidate theoretical work as an aid to comprehension and; (v) to help remember facts and principles.…”
Section: Teachers' Views Of the Aims Of Laboratory Workcontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the first six most important aims they nominated were: (i) to gain practice of making observations and descriptions of objects (7 respondents); (ii) to promote the method of reasoning and logical thinking in problemsolving (7 respondents); (iii) to make science more interesting and fun through current experiences (6); (iv) to make the biological/chemical phenomena more real through actual experience (6); (v) to verify or clarify events and principles already taught in tutorials explaining their relationship (6); and to discover facts and come up with new principles (6). These results differ to some extent from those indicated by the teachers in the Swain et al (1999) study. For instance, the Korean teachers indicated the five most important aims as follows: (i) for finding facts and arriving at new principles; (ii) as a creative activity; (iii) to verify facts and principles already taught; (iv) to elucidate theoretical work as an aid to comprehension and; (v) to help remember facts and principles.…”
Section: Teachers' Views Of the Aims Of Laboratory Workcontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Apparently, their opinions were symmetrically divided between important and most important aims. Important to note is that the perceived aims as the most important appear to be more oriented towards both content and investigative components when compared with the Korean teachers' views in the Swain et al (1999) study. Concerning the length of the Biology and Chemistry syllabus teachers felt that there is a need of revision if the Ministry of Education wants them to conduct laboratory sessions in their classes and hence, comply with its aims.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…According to Kapenda et al (2002) the desirable characteristics of practical work in developing countries have been highlighted by authors such as Kahn (1990) and Swain, Monk and Johnson (1999). However little is known about what practical activities are actually executed in most African classrooms, and even less about factors which might facilitate their implementation.…”
Section: Figure 1: Framework Of Curriculum Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, some stakeholders have suggested that practical work should be thought of as 'fact finding-missions' and that students should be able to discover as well as being told. These roles appear in the lists developed in previous studies (Beatty & Woolnough, 1982;Kerr, 1963;Parkinson, 2004;Swain, Monk & Johnson, 1999). Although these views are offered by science/ physics teachers in SSA, there is effectively no evidence that they are translated into practice-they can only be regarded as aspirational.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%