2021
DOI: 10.52872/001c.29948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in the rural and urban population of Uttarakhand, India

Abstract: BackgroundThe public is hesitant about getting vaccinated for COVID-19, and a few people are still avoiding it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the attitude towards COVID-19 vaccination among rural and urban populations of the Dehradun district in Uttarakhand, India. Materials and methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from April to June 2021 in selected urban and rural areas of the Dehradun district, yielding 770 responses (385 from both rural and urban areas). The attitudes towards COVID-19 vacc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On critical analysis of the scenario, it was seen that these hurdles were more prevalent in the rural areas during the initial stages of the pandemic. This observation is consistent with the findings of a study conducted by Rakesh Sharma, Prasuna Jelly, Vishwas AS, Lisa Chadha, Vartika Saxena, and Latika Mohan Sharma et al (2021) titled "A comparative study of attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in the rural and urban population of Uttarakhand," which concluded that rural population had a more sceptical attitude towards vaccines during the early stages of the pandemic. Most of the studies conducted in context to vaccination either talks about India as a whole or only about metropolitan cities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On critical analysis of the scenario, it was seen that these hurdles were more prevalent in the rural areas during the initial stages of the pandemic. This observation is consistent with the findings of a study conducted by Rakesh Sharma, Prasuna Jelly, Vishwas AS, Lisa Chadha, Vartika Saxena, and Latika Mohan Sharma et al (2021) titled "A comparative study of attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in the rural and urban population of Uttarakhand," which concluded that rural population had a more sceptical attitude towards vaccines during the early stages of the pandemic. Most of the studies conducted in context to vaccination either talks about India as a whole or only about metropolitan cities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Upon the answers concerning the reason why they are not accepting the COVID-19 vaccine, the most represented was "the vaccine may not be safe/efficient enough regarding the rapid speed of synthesis and approval for emergence use by WHO". Many studies, in line with our inquiry, have already incriminated concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy as one of the major reason of vaccine hesitancy [17,18,21]. This can be explained by the fact that, intentional or not, misrepresentation and misinformation can derail progress in COVID-19 vaccination coverage, particularly if audiences choose not to seek COVID-19 information from official sources, such as WHO, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or medical professional associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Upon the answers concerning the reason why they were not accepting the COVID-19 vaccine, the most represented answer was “the vaccine may not be safe/efficient enough regarding the rapid speed of synthesis and approval for emergence use by WHO”. Many studies, in line with our inquiry, already incriminated concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy as one of the major reason of vaccine hesitancy [ 21 , 22 , 25 ]. This can be explained by the fact that, intentional or not, misrepresentation and misinformation can derail progress in COVID-19 vaccination coverage, particularly if audiences choose not to seek COVID-19 information from official sources, such as WHO, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or medical professional associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%