2023
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-023-11026-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of basic and ensemble artificial intelligence models for surface roughness prediction during the AA7075 milling process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models tested in this study include SVM, k-NN, and RF. To enhance our analysis, we have introduced two additional potent models: eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Binary deep neural network (BDNN) [39,40], for comparison with the stacking ensemble model proposed in this research. We will validate these models through a comprehensive process of parameter tuning, training, and validation to assess their performance while considering various combinations of selected features.…”
Section: Parameter Tuning Training and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The models tested in this study include SVM, k-NN, and RF. To enhance our analysis, we have introduced two additional potent models: eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Binary deep neural network (BDNN) [39,40], for comparison with the stacking ensemble model proposed in this research. We will validate these models through a comprehensive process of parameter tuning, training, and validation to assess their performance while considering various combinations of selected features.…”
Section: Parameter Tuning Training and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a single model may only capture a specific aspect of the data, potentially missing out on other important patterns or insights. To address these limitations, three modeling techniques (DOE, SVM, and BNN) were compared in [28] to develop a predictive model for surface roughness, while [29] represents the study examining thirteen machine learning algorithms in the context of surface roughness, including seven basic models and six ensemble models. In [30], SVR and ANN integrated with GA were employed to optimize turning operations, showcasing their superiority over traditional models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%