2012
DOI: 10.1201/b12352-514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of bridge traffic load effect using micro-simulation and Eurocode load models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while the adopted procedure may be fully used to output stress or stress resultants, such as bending moment [19,73], this requires the choice of a structural form for the bridges to be analysed. Since such forms may be quite different for long spans, the use of the total load is adopted here to maintain the generality of the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while the adopted procedure may be fully used to output stress or stress resultants, such as bending moment [19,73], this requires the choice of a structural form for the bridges to be analysed. Since such forms may be quite different for long spans, the use of the total load is adopted here to maintain the generality of the study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the specific structure and maintenance strategy, the bridge owner and engineer must choose a suitable return period for safety verification. In the case of medium-term examination, a return period of 75 years is considered reasonable, as other recent European research has used (Lipari, O'Brien, & Caprani, 2012), and will be used as an input parameter for this work. The notion of degree of compliance, n, is introduced for deterministic verification of the structural safety in the Swiss standards for existing structures (Brühwiler, Vogel, Lang, & Lüchinger, 2012) and is given by:…”
Section: Code-based Approaches For Safety Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to highlight the influence of several traffic features on bridge loading, a simplified vehicle stream made up of two classes of vehicle, cars and trucks, is used with the parameters shown in Table 4. Real sites are likely to have a more complex traffic stream, but site-specific traffic data could be equally introduced [87].…”
Section: Application Of Microsimulation To Bridge Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National Annexes may extend the span limit of application of LM1. For instance, the UK National Annex extends its application up to 1500 m. Again, LM1 may be significantly reduced when using site-specific traffic data, with traffic microsimulation used to replicate congestion events [87].…”
Section: Main Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%