2012
DOI: 10.1080/09544828.2010.542133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of changes across the lifecycle of complex products in a variant and a customised industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet as discussed by Andreasen & Howard (2012), this process is ill supported by existing methodology. As such, it seems that most late design changes and development lead-time can be traced back to decisions made during embodiment (Vianello et al, 2012). Most optimisation and robust design methods are highly dependent on knowledge that is not necessarily available at an early stage of development and are therefore often applied at least after a preliminary embodiment has been developed (Papalambros & Wilde, 2017), (Ebro & Howard, 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet as discussed by Andreasen & Howard (2012), this process is ill supported by existing methodology. As such, it seems that most late design changes and development lead-time can be traced back to decisions made during embodiment (Vianello et al, 2012). Most optimisation and robust design methods are highly dependent on knowledge that is not necessarily available at an early stage of development and are therefore often applied at least after a preliminary embodiment has been developed (Papalambros & Wilde, 2017), (Ebro & Howard, 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levandowski et al [9] presented a variant design approach for engineering-to-order configuration design. Vianello et al [10] focused on investigating the characteristics of engineering changes. Luh et al [11] proposed an information model to analyze and improve complex design processes and product architecture.…”
Section: Solutions To Customer Requirements (Crs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During manufacturing process, voids and shrinkage must be avoided. Voids and porosity are one of the most critical problems during the manufacturing process [60,61]. It is proposed, thatprimary structures (wings, fuselage) must be resistant to fatigue and environmental effects (expensive materials).…”
Section: Manufacturing Requirements and Processes For Cfcmentioning
confidence: 99%