2012
DOI: 10.1186/2229-0443-2-3-33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of composing processes in reading- and graph-based writing tasks

Abstract: The study compares EFL writers' processes in composing readingbased writing (RW) and graph-based writing (GW) tasks developed for a university English proficiency exam. Think-aloud protocols and interviews of ten university-level nonnative English-speaking writers were collected to explore writers' composing processes. The results revealed that both types of the tasks require global comprehension of source texts as well as integrative manipulation of available information for writing. Some differences, however… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to identifying unique cognitive processes within the EFL context, this study also demonstrated that EFL learners engaged in an interactive and recursive composing process (Plakans, 2008;Yang, 2012). The detailed descriptions of axial coding schemes (refer to Section 4.1.1-6) revealed that the identified processes were not entirely independent of each other in sustaining SCWT writing.…”
Section: Writing Process In the Efl Integrated Writingmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In addition to identifying unique cognitive processes within the EFL context, this study also demonstrated that EFL learners engaged in an interactive and recursive composing process (Plakans, 2008;Yang, 2012). The detailed descriptions of axial coding schemes (refer to Section 4.1.1-6) revealed that the identified processes were not entirely independent of each other in sustaining SCWT writing.…”
Section: Writing Process In the Efl Integrated Writingmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The essay questions on Screens 6 and 7 were scored by two graduate students, majoring in English language education, using an overall rating scale ranging from 0 to 5. For the rating scale, Yang's (2012) scoring rubric for the reading-based writing and graph-based writing tasks was used with some modifications to fit the essay questions created in this study (see Table 9 in Appendix). Prior to the start of scoring, a rater training session was conducted.…”
Section: Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%