2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.06.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
192
4
27

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
21
192
4
27
Order By: Relevance
“…30 Knowledge of both the anatomy and the anatomical variations of the mandibular canal are essential to the success of mandible-related dental procedures. It is important that these variations be identified to prevent treatment complications.…”
Section: A B C D Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 Knowledge of both the anatomy and the anatomical variations of the mandibular canal are essential to the success of mandible-related dental procedures. It is important that these variations be identified to prevent treatment complications.…”
Section: A B C D Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recommended in this study to use CBCT as secondary diagnostic modality when panoramic radiograph Gomes et al 2008 Panoramic radiograph does not has a high diagnostic accuracy when it is used in the assessment of risk in surgical extractions of lower third molars Tantanapornkul et al 2007Ghaeminia et al 2011 The diagnostic accuracy of CBCT was superior to panoramic radiography in predicting neurovascular bundle exposure following assessment of the relationship of the third molar root tip to the IAC Hasegawa et al 2013 Panoramic findings mostly inconsistent (62.5%) to CBCT findings. Thus, in planning surgical removal of mandibular third molar, panoramic radiography alone does not provide sufficiently reliable images to assess the risk associated with nerve exposure Peker et al 2014 Less accuracy in panoramic radiograph may indicate further preoperative assessment of impacted mandibular third molar with CBCT especially when darkening of the roots and interruption of the white line are observed on panoramic images shows superimposition of the third molar root on the roof of IAC and the presence of root below the roof of the canal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unlike panoramic radiography which uses an average dental arch as focal trough, the ability of the CBCT technology to customize the focal trough shape to suit an individual dental arch allows for improved visualization of the anatomical structures of the region of interest. It is generally agreed that CBCT proved to be a reliable technique for visualizing anatomical structures in the maxillofacial region including the IAC, and for assessing its relationship to the adjacent roots of teeth (Angelopoulus et al 2008;Sawamura et al 2003;Tantanapornkul et al 2007). However, the higher radiation dose and cost of CBCT in comparison to panoramic radiography limits the use of this modality to cases where conventional radiographic findings justify further assessment with CBCT (SEDENTEXCT project 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Panoramic signs of superimposition of the roots on the canal along with interruption of radiopaque border of canal were most frequent while panoramic signs of superimposition in conjunction with narrowing and deviation of the inferior alveolar canal were least frequent respectively found in another study. 10 On the other hand, had shown that darkening of roots (42.9%) was the most common finding followed by narrowing of inferior alveolar canal (28.9%). 11 In different studies reported that the root of lower third molar was in contact with the inferior alveolar canal 85 and 94% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%