2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of coupled and decoupled fan flutter prediction methods under variation of mass ratio and blade stiffness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first one consists in neglecting the impact of the flow on the structure dynamics for the evaluation of aerodynamic forces due to vibrations, while the second one consists in a strong aeroelastic coupling. The approach to be used depends on the case, as the flow may have some impact on the structure dynamics [11]. Even if the second approach may be more precise, it may be computationally expensive to apply, as the first one already gives good insights on the flutter stability while lowering the computationnal costs.…”
Section: Aeroelastic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first one consists in neglecting the impact of the flow on the structure dynamics for the evaluation of aerodynamic forces due to vibrations, while the second one consists in a strong aeroelastic coupling. The approach to be used depends on the case, as the flow may have some impact on the structure dynamics [11]. Even if the second approach may be more precise, it may be computationally expensive to apply, as the first one already gives good insights on the flutter stability while lowering the computationnal costs.…”
Section: Aeroelastic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, a linear approach of the structure is sufficient to assess the fan stage aeroelastic stability. Two approaches may be used to do so, as well explained in [11] : the first one consists in neglecting the effects of aerodynamics on the fan stage dynamics and then to assess stability by studying aeroelastic stability of the structural modes of the fan with harmonic motion ; the second one consists in using strong coupling (partitionned or monolithic approaches) to take into account the effects of the fluid onto the structure dynamics. However, if it is sufficient to consider a linear structure to assess stability limits, it is possible to find stable solutions of the aeroelastic system beyond the stability limits predicted with a linear structure by taking into account nonlinear effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chahine et al [9] studied the transonic fan rotor at various combinations of mass ratio and stiffness using both decoupled and fully-coupled methods. They found that these two methods are in good agreement over a large range of structural condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cost of performing a single time-accurate aero-elastic computation is still excessive, making adjoint optimization a very demanding task. In the attempt to circumvent this issue, reduced order models for aero-elastic turbomachinery computations have been proposed [3,4,5,6,7], the vast majority of them being based on the so-called energy method [8]. This method enables flutter and forced response analysis with engineering accuracy by means of unsteady fluid-dynamic simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%