2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of creation of self-brand connection amongst well-liked, new, and unfavorable brands

Abstract: Brand managers are wary of consumers who are either unaware of new brands or have an unfavorable attitude toward their brands. In this study, we investigate the creation of a self-brand connection with new and unfavorable brands in comparison to well-liked brands. Our empirical study reveals that consumers could form a self-brand connection with new and unfavorable brands when the brand serves as a self-presentational strategy-self-presentation by brand. In particular, first, we find that brand attitude predic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, individuals’ SBCs played a mediating role in the influence of in-group orientations on psychological distance toward the brand. Findings were consistent with the previous studies showing that individuals consider their in-groups as a reference group when building connections with brands (Cross & Madson, 1997; Song et al, 2017; Tan et al, 2018). As Escalas and Bettman (2003) found, individuals seem to develop strong connections with the brands whose images are consistent with their social groups that are critical to them.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, individuals’ SBCs played a mediating role in the influence of in-group orientations on psychological distance toward the brand. Findings were consistent with the previous studies showing that individuals consider their in-groups as a reference group when building connections with brands (Cross & Madson, 1997; Song et al, 2017; Tan et al, 2018). As Escalas and Bettman (2003) found, individuals seem to develop strong connections with the brands whose images are consistent with their social groups that are critical to them.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Consumers select brands to maintain and enhance their self-identity and to satisfy their needs for self-expression. When consumers utilize a brand to construct their self-identity, they connect the set of brand associations with their psychological representation of the self (Dwivedi et al, 2014; Escalas, 2004; Krugman, 1965; Song et al, 2017; Tan et al, 2018), which refers to “self-brand connections”. Social identity theory suggests that in the process of forming one’s self-concept, an individual tends to consider his or her social groups and the society he or she belongs to (Cross & Madson, 1997).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of literature indicates that consumers develop a close relationship with brands (e.g., Fournier, 1998; Fournier & Alvarez, 2012; Grisaffe & Nguyen, 2011; Tan et al, 2018; Thomson et al, 2005). For example, consumers develop an emotional connection with brands and build long‐term relationships with these brands similar to their relationships with other human beings (e.g., Escalas & Bettman, 2003, Malär et al, 2011, Park et al, 2010; Thomson et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An SBC is recognized as an indispensable component of the brand relationship as it shows the process by which consumers create a strong sense of bonding with a brand (Tan et al , 2018). Consumers perceive that brands feature a broad range of distinct attributes that are consistent with their personalities (Whan Park et al , 2010; Gaustad et al , 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%