2008
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-s1-s13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of different machine learning methods on microarray gene expression data

Abstract: Background: Several classification and feature selection methods have been studied for the identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray data. Classification methods such as SVM, RBF Neural Nets, MLP Neural Nets, Bayesian, Decision Tree and Random Forrest methods have been used in recent studies. The accuracy of these methods has been calculated with validation methods such as v-fold validation. However there is lack of comparison between these methods to find a better framework for classifica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
145
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
145
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, machine-learning techniques have been used extensively in medicine, 21 in gene expression studies, [22][23][24] for classification of cardiac arrhythmias, 25 for predicting morbidity after coronary artery bypass surgery, 26 and for predicting when weaning from ventilator support should begin. 27 Gaussian processes have been applied in adults with ALI to model the pressure-volume curve to titrate PEEP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, machine-learning techniques have been used extensively in medicine, 21 in gene expression studies, [22][23][24] for classification of cardiac arrhythmias, 25 for predicting morbidity after coronary artery bypass surgery, 26 and for predicting when weaning from ventilator support should begin. 27 Gaussian processes have been applied in adults with ALI to model the pressure-volume curve to titrate PEEP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithms divide all objects into a predetermined number of groups in a manner that maximizes a similarity function. There are two different approaches, that are commonly used in medical studies ( [35] and [36]): the Expectation Maximization (EM) probabilistic method and deterministic k-means algorithm.…”
Section: Unsupervised Learning With Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9] the efficiency of the classification methods including SVM, RBF Neural Nets, MLP Neural Nets, Bayesian, Decision Tree and Random Forrest methods were compared. Some of the common clustering techniques including Kmeans, DBC, and EM algorithms were applied to the datasets and the efficiency of these methods has been analyzed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They divide the objects into a predetermined number of groups in a manner that maximizes a similarity function. During investigations of the proposed methodology, two different approaches, commonly used in medical studies ( [9]) will be considered: the Expectation Maximization (EM) probabilistic approach and deterministic k-means algorithm.…”
Section: Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%