2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of different classification techniques for marine oil spill identification using RADARSAT-1 imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
85
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The RF method was adopted for this study because of its robustness and effectiveness in the classification of varying object types and ease of the execution. Compared to SVM, RF is able to achieve a comparably high classification precision with fewer initialized parameters [25,26]. Random forest only requires two parameters: the number of decision trees (ntree) and the number of random split variable characteristics (mty) [27,28].…”
Section: Coarse Extraction Of Windthrown Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RF method was adopted for this study because of its robustness and effectiveness in the classification of varying object types and ease of the execution. Compared to SVM, RF is able to achieve a comparably high classification precision with fewer initialized parameters [25,26]. Random forest only requires two parameters: the number of decision trees (ntree) and the number of random split variable characteristics (mty) [27,28].…”
Section: Coarse Extraction Of Windthrown Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AUC is a very popular way of comparing overall classifier performance and one of the most cited techniques in natural hazard researches Woods et al, 1997;Xu et al, 2014). The success and prediction accuracies of seven flood models were assessed qualitatively and presented in The flood susceptibility maps derived from polygon, 1000, 700, 500, 300, 100 and 50 produced the success rates of 60%, 75%, 82%, 81%, 77%, 72% and 62% respectively, and the prediction rates of 63%, 76%, 88%, 80%, 74%, 71% and 65% respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bare soil also showed the highest sensitivity value (~0.99) that indicated the high potential of optimized SVM classifier to detect this class. The sensitivityspecificity pair describes the classification accuracy more meaningfully than the single index of percentage correct, and it has been widely implemented with ROC curve analysis in the literature [Alatorre et al, 2011;Xu et al, 2014]. The approach developed in this study, took two important aspects of the definition of PCC in to consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%