2021
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of extensive machine learning models for predicting long‐term monthly rainfall with an ensemble of climatic and meteorological predictors

Abstract: Rainfall prediction is of vital importance in water resources management. Accurate long-term rainfall prediction remains an open and challenging problem. Machine learning techniques, as an increasingly popular approach, provide an attractive alternative to traditional methods. The main objective of this study was to improve the prediction accuracy of machine learning-based methods for monthly rainfall, and to improve the understanding of the role of large-scale climatic variables and local meteorological varia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The RMSE and MAE range from 48 mm to 79 mm and from 35 mm to 51 mm, respectively. It presents analogous ranges of the evaluation metrics with the previous predictions at the lower reach of the Yangtze River [25], illustrating the models in this study perform in the reasonable range. Among the base models, ANN at Xujiahui had the best prediction accuracy with the highest R 2 and the smallest RMSE and MAE, while the accuracy of KNN was the worst in terms of the three metrics at almost all the stations.…”
Section: Intercomparison Of Model Performancessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The RMSE and MAE range from 48 mm to 79 mm and from 35 mm to 51 mm, respectively. It presents analogous ranges of the evaluation metrics with the previous predictions at the lower reach of the Yangtze River [25], illustrating the models in this study perform in the reasonable range. Among the base models, ANN at Xujiahui had the best prediction accuracy with the highest R 2 and the smallest RMSE and MAE, while the accuracy of KNN was the worst in terms of the three metrics at almost all the stations.…”
Section: Intercomparison Of Model Performancessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In particular, precipitation forecasts up to several months in advance can provide vital information for early warning of disasters and socioeconomic decision‐making for regional water management (Hao et al, 2018; Xu et al, 2020). However, prediction at the monthly time scale is challenging due to complicated mechanisms subjected to fast damping of atmospheric initial signals and inadequate representation of boundary conditions (Pegion et al, 2019; Wu et al, 2022; Zhou et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rainfall prediction methods can be grouped under three categories: physical methods, statistical methods, and machine learning methods. The physical methods are conventional models that are developed using numerical weather prediction, rule-based approaches, or simulations and require a thorough description of the physical and dynamic processes of the interactions between the variables, i.e., the mathematical equations [2]. However, these models usually have a limited efficiency, computational capacity, and resolution [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical methods are conventional models that are developed using numerical weather prediction, rule-based approaches, or simulations and require a thorough description of the physical and dynamic processes of the interactions between the variables, i.e., the mathematical equations [2]. However, these models usually have a limited efficiency, computational capacity, and resolution [2]. The statistical methods aim to uncover the mathematical relationship and investigate the features of the historical time series, such as the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA), the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and the Holt-Winters and hidden Markov models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation