1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0198-8859(97)00085-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of HLA-DRB Typing by Transcription-Mediated Amplification with the Hybridization Protection Assay (TMA/HPA) versus PCR/SSOP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An RNA or DNA target is amplified with an amplicon, ssRNA [192,193]. The first primer anneals within the target and DNA polymerase activity of reverse transcriptase extends the DNA chain.…”
Section: Tmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An RNA or DNA target is amplified with an amplicon, ssRNA [192,193]. The first primer anneals within the target and DNA polymerase activity of reverse transcriptase extends the DNA chain.…”
Section: Tmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1995, UNOS mandated the sharing of all HLA-0MM kidneys, a decision which allowed a “blank” (e.g., A2-, B7-, and DR4-) to be considered as evidence of homozygosity for the purposes of the sharing program. This new confidence was based on significant advances in accuracy of HLA typing made possible by the polymerase chain reaction technique with sequence-specific primer (5) and other DNA-based approaches (9). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, DNA typing techniques are not free of errors because they depend on sensitive procedures conducted at specific temperatures, good DNA quality, adequate reagents, and also correct interpretation of the results. Despite the importance of the reliability of different HLA DNA typing methods, few comparative studies have been performed between these techniques (Smith et al 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%