2018 International Workshop on Advanced Image Technology (IWAIT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iwait.2018.8369657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A comparative study of image quality assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unless stated otherwise, we report the mean squared error (MSE), the structural similarity index (SSIM; Wang, Bovik, Sheikh, & Simoncelli, 2004 ), and either the peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) or the feature similarity index (FSIM; Zhang, Zhang, Mou, & Zhang, 2011 ) between the reconstruction and the input image, as evaluated using the Scikit-image library (version 0.16.2) for Python ( Van Der Walt et al, 2014 ). Where MSE and PSNR are image quality assessment metrics that operate on pixel intensity, SSIM and FSIM are popular alternatives that better reflect perceptual quality ( Preedanan, Kondo, Bunnun, & Kumazawa, 2018 ). In addition to these performance metrics, we report the average percentage of activated electrodes as a measure for sparsity.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless stated otherwise, we report the mean squared error (MSE), the structural similarity index (SSIM; Wang, Bovik, Sheikh, & Simoncelli, 2004 ), and either the peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) or the feature similarity index (FSIM; Zhang, Zhang, Mou, & Zhang, 2011 ) between the reconstruction and the input image, as evaluated using the Scikit-image library (version 0.16.2) for Python ( Van Der Walt et al, 2014 ). Where MSE and PSNR are image quality assessment metrics that operate on pixel intensity, SSIM and FSIM are popular alternatives that better reflect perceptual quality ( Preedanan, Kondo, Bunnun, & Kumazawa, 2018 ). In addition to these performance metrics, we report the average percentage of activated electrodes as a measure for sparsity.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) Peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) is a quality measurement calculated based on 2 image objects compared to MSE [21]- [23]. Comparison between the maximum values of the signal is measured by the amount of noise that affects the signal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three metrics are used to evaluate the results of image segmentation. They are peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) [21]- [23], structural similarity index (SSIM) [25], and feature similarity index (FSIM) [24]. TABLE 2 is a brief summary of the three parameters.…”
Section: B Pmvo For Multilevel Image Segmentation Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the minimum cross-entropy threshold (MCET) [17]- [20] has the advantage of being able to deal with multilevel threshold constraints very well and obtain accurate threshold values, we apply the proposed PMVO algorithm to optimize the MCET function in order to obtain the thresholds to segment the color image. The segmented image quality is ultimately assessed in three well-known metrics: peak signal noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and feature similarity index (FSIM) [21]- [25]. The results show that the proposed PMVO algorithm can obtain higher quality segmented images than those compared algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%