Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
BACKGROUNDSpinal Anaesthesia is the most common approach which is used for lower limb surgery. Ropivacaine is the preferred compound in comparison of Bupivacaine as firstly it is enantiomer specific which shows less cardio and neuro toxicity, and secondly it shows rapid recovery of motor functions and prolonged duration of sensory block. Dexmedetomidine, a neuraxial adjuvant, is highly selective α2 adrenoceptor agonist found in dorsal horn of spinal cord and in brain too to produce analgesic effect. We wanted to establish efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as a neuraxial adjuvant given intrathecally with 3 ml of 0.75% isobaric Ropivacaine to prolong anaesthesia and analgesia in spinal anaesthesia without additionally disturbing haemodynamic profile. METHODSIn our study, we took 60 patients fulfilling the inclusive and exclusive criteria scheduled for lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. They were randomly divided into two groups R and RD. R group received 3 ml of 0.75% isobaric Ropivacaine + 0.5 ml normal saline and RD group received 3 ml of 0.75% isobaric Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine 10 µg in (0.5 ml normal saline). Spinal anaesthesia was given with 25-gauge pencil point spinal needle in L3-L4 space under all aseptic conditions and drug was deposited after free flow of CSF was seen. RESULTSWe observed in our study that mean time taken by group RD to achieve desired block was less as compared to group R. The sensory and motor block was more prolonged and highly significant in group RD as compared to group R. Hemodynamic profile was same in both the groups. Duration of post-operative analgesia was more in group RD as compared to group R. Absolute analgesia duration being 350.33±59.49 in group RD as compared to 215.03±25.57 in group R (p<.001) the difference being statistically highly significant. The duration of effective analgesia in group RD was 490.83±38.73 minutes as compared to 271.83±34.43 minutes in group R (p<0.001). This difference was highly significant statistically. Sedation score was more in group RD as compared to group R. CONCLUSIONSThe effect of Ropivacaine in spinal anaesthesia can be potentiated by combining Dexmedetomidine, a neuraxial adjuvant, in a dose dependent manner. It does not produce any extra adverse effects. It could be an attractive alternative to General Anaesthesia in patients who require long duration surgery with cardiovascular and neurological co-morbidity. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE:Saxena M, Dwibedy AM, Verma S, et al. Isobaric ropivacaine 0.75%, with and without intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant, in lower limb surgery-a comparison.
BACKGROUNDSpinal Anaesthesia is the most common approach which is used for lower limb surgery. Ropivacaine is the preferred compound in comparison of Bupivacaine as firstly it is enantiomer specific which shows less cardio and neuro toxicity, and secondly it shows rapid recovery of motor functions and prolonged duration of sensory block. Dexmedetomidine, a neuraxial adjuvant, is highly selective α2 adrenoceptor agonist found in dorsal horn of spinal cord and in brain too to produce analgesic effect. We wanted to establish efficacy of Dexmedetomidine as a neuraxial adjuvant given intrathecally with 3 ml of 0.75% isobaric Ropivacaine to prolong anaesthesia and analgesia in spinal anaesthesia without additionally disturbing haemodynamic profile. METHODSIn our study, we took 60 patients fulfilling the inclusive and exclusive criteria scheduled for lower limb surgeries under spinal anaesthesia. They were randomly divided into two groups R and RD. R group received 3 ml of 0.75% isobaric Ropivacaine + 0.5 ml normal saline and RD group received 3 ml of 0.75% isobaric Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine 10 µg in (0.5 ml normal saline). Spinal anaesthesia was given with 25-gauge pencil point spinal needle in L3-L4 space under all aseptic conditions and drug was deposited after free flow of CSF was seen. RESULTSWe observed in our study that mean time taken by group RD to achieve desired block was less as compared to group R. The sensory and motor block was more prolonged and highly significant in group RD as compared to group R. Hemodynamic profile was same in both the groups. Duration of post-operative analgesia was more in group RD as compared to group R. Absolute analgesia duration being 350.33±59.49 in group RD as compared to 215.03±25.57 in group R (p<.001) the difference being statistically highly significant. The duration of effective analgesia in group RD was 490.83±38.73 minutes as compared to 271.83±34.43 minutes in group R (p<0.001). This difference was highly significant statistically. Sedation score was more in group RD as compared to group R. CONCLUSIONSThe effect of Ropivacaine in spinal anaesthesia can be potentiated by combining Dexmedetomidine, a neuraxial adjuvant, in a dose dependent manner. It does not produce any extra adverse effects. It could be an attractive alternative to General Anaesthesia in patients who require long duration surgery with cardiovascular and neurological co-morbidity. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE:Saxena M, Dwibedy AM, Verma S, et al. Isobaric ropivacaine 0.75%, with and without intrathecal dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant, in lower limb surgery-a comparison.
Background: Spinal anesthesia is widely used regional anesthesia technique; however, postoperative analgesia is a major problem. The duration of analgesia can be prolonged by the addition of intrathecal adjuvants. Hence, this study is aimed to assess the characteristics of spinal block between the groups. Patients and Methods: One hundred and twenty-six adult patients were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized into three groups of 42 in each group by the computer-generated numbers. Group A received 12.5 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine (2.5 ml) + 25 mcg fentanyl (0.5 ml), Group B received 12.5 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine (2.5 ml) + 5 mcg dexmedetomidine (0.1 ml) + 0.4 ml normal saline (NS), and Group C received 12.5 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine (2.5 ml) + 0.5 ml NS. Block characteristics and hemodynamic changes were recorded between the groups. Results: Time to achieve sensory block (T10) and motor block (M1) were faster in Group B when compared to Group A and C (P < 0.001). Duration of sensory block and motor block was longer with Group B (450.12 ± 22.295 min and 390.12 ± 22.551 min) when compared to Group A (380.71 ± 13.331 min and 320.71 ± 13.403 min) and Group C (220.10 ± 14.635 min and 180.10 ± 14.355 min). Time for first rescue analgesia was also longer in Group B when compared to Groups A and C (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine provides effective prolongation of sensory and motor block as adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.